AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Chat gpt vs google3/30/2024 ![]() Technically, ChatGPT Plus was able to put the email into the right tone, but the writing was stilted and relied too much on formal structures, starting off with, “I hope this message finds you well.” Also, the bot offered multiple tips for making my emails less mean in the future. Not only was the chatbot’s rewording appropriate for work, it was composed well enough to send without any adjustments. Gemini Advanced succeeded in the rephrasing test. Curious how well these tools are at rephrasing nasty emails into a more professional tone, I composed a scathing message for my editor (who’s an absolute angel, and whom I would never be mean to) and asked both chatbots to make it appropriate for the workplace. After uploading a transcript from an interview with a video game developer, I asked the chatbots, “Could you please summarize this meeting transcript into five bullet points?”Īnother common in-office application for chatbots is to improve email correspondence. So I tried to see how well ChatGPT Plus and Gemini Advanced would be at a basic meeting summary. To start off, chatbots are often positioned as a productivity tool for white-collar workers. ![]() For this reason, I just compared the results of ChatGPT Plus and Gemini Advanced. (For example, I have too much respect for coders to pretend that I could gauge the worthiness of an AI tool for software development.) Also, since Microsoft’s offering uses the same generative AI models as OpenAI’s service, you can expect similar results from both tools. For the average chatbot user, who may utilize AI to craft emails at work and Rick and Morty fan fiction at home, the basic versions of ChatGPT and Gemini are free, competent, and wildly more powerful than anything available in the recent past.Ĭomparing Outputs From Gemini Advanced and ChatGPT PlusĮven though we have experience testing a variety of chatbots at WIRED and putting fresh AI features to the test, keep in mind that these comparisons are designed to give you an overview of how the tools work. ![]() If you have a specialized need for the tool, like coding, or want to experiment with powerful AI models and features currently available, then Gemini Advanced or ChatGPT Plus might be worth $20 a month. But, do you really need to factor another pricey subscription into your budget? After hours of testing these subscription chatbots and prodding at their limitations, my two core takeaways remain the same in 2024 as they were last year when these services first arrived.įirst, most people are fine with the free option. Additionally, Microsoft sells subscriptions to its top tool, Copilot Pro (which is also powered by ChatGPT-4), for the same price. In doing so, Google was following the precedent set by OpenAI, which sells access to its GPT-4-powered chatbot for $20 a month. In early February, the company began offering access to Gemini Advanced for $20 a month. Google is the latest company to offer one of its best AI chatbots as a subscription product. Even though companies often tout esoteric benchmarks to prove their chatbot’s superiority, it can be hard to discern how a chatbot’s technical prowess translates into a better experience for you, the user. The same tool is used for disparate applications the same software service that developers in San Francisco are using to build their latest app might also be used by parents in Kansas to plan a Paw Patrol birthday. In the case of Bard, the ability to work with code at all is a relatively recent addition, with the announcement going out in April of 2023.The problem with testing AI chatbot subscriptions like Google’s Gemini Advanced and OpenAI’s ChatGPT Plus is their generality. If you use the paid GPT-4 version of ChatGPT, things are even more robust, but OpenAI has Codex, which is specifically designed to convert natural language into code and should (on paper) outperform ChatGPT in this area. It has impressive coding capabilities despite this, but that's not what it's meant for. ![]() First, ChatGPT is not fine-tuned for coding. That being said, the Bing AI search engine is built on GPT-4 and is also directly connected to the internet, so it's a more direct competitor for Bard as a web search tool in particular.īoth ChatGPT and Bard have the ability to generate programming code, find bugs, and explain what a piece of code does.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |